Following months of public debate and community action, Amazon announced last week that it would continue to grow its workforce in New York, but would not follow through on plans to build a new campus in Queens. Through a deal negotiated by the governor and mayor behind closed doors and without legislative review, New York had offered Amazon nearly $3 billion in tax subsidies.
But the deal quickly became a flashpoint in public discussions around inequality, tax breaks for big business, and the power of monopolistic firms to bend the rules to their own advantage. The odds were long, but community organizing and public accountability ultimately prevailed.
While all eyes have been on New York, Amazon has begun to encounter similar opposition in northern Virginia and Nashville. And its ruthless HQ2 sweepstakes have inspired a new movement to limit corporate giveaways (follow Good Jobs First for latest on this).
For other good commentary on the HQ2 saga, we recommend David Leonhardt’s column in the New York Times; this call-to-arms piece from last fall by Ron Kim and Zephyr Teachout, also in the Times; and this piece by Hamilton Nolan in Splinter.
If you liked this post, be sure to sign up for the monthly Hometown Advantage newsletter for our latest reporting and research.
In Washington Monthly: Amazon’s AI Algorithms are Raising Prices
Online price swings may look like fierce competition. In reality, they’re part of an invisible strategy Amazon uses to maintain its dominance of e-commerce and...
ILSR's virtual event spotlights how pricing algorithms deployed by powerful corporations are inflating prices, undermining competition, and threatening independent businesses and communities.