Back to top Jump to featured resources
Article filed under Energy, Energy Self-Reliant States

California County’s PACE Program Could Get Feisty with FHFA

| Written by John Farrell | 2 Comments | Updated on Aug 23, 2012 The content that follows was originally published on the Institute for Local Self-Reliance website at http://ilsr.org/california-countys-pace-program-feisty-fhfa/
4517691169_b02a20dd5f

Does a Riverside County, CA, residential energy financing program put thousands of homeowners on a collision course with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA)?

In a proposed rule-making, the FHFA has suggested that Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) policies represent a threat to the safety and soundness of mortgages held by government-backed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  PACE is a unique financing strategy that allows homes and businesses to invest in significant energy efficiency and renewable energy upgrades and pay them back through a property tax assessment (for an explanation of PACE, see this PACE 101 slideshow).  The fight with FHFA stems from these assessments being “first liens,” e.g. in the event of bankruptcy, they are paid back before the mortgage holder (FHFA’s Fannie or Freddie).

The FHFA’s initial ruling in 2010 brought most residential PACE programs to a screeching halt, because residential participants would be threatened with having to pay their entire mortgage – in full – at any time.  Residential PACE programs in Boulder, CO, and Sonoma County, CA, and elsewhere were suspended after the FHFA ruling.

But Riverside County launched its Home Energy Renovation Opportunity (HERO) Financing Program in late 2011, almost a year after FHFA had thrown down the gauntlet.  Since then, over 2,000 homeowners have signed up (acknowledging the FHFA threat in writing) and proceeded with tens of millions in home renovations improving efficiency, generating local energy, and creating jobs.  These participants have already met thresholds for positive equity in their home, and been current on the mortgage and property tax payments.

By keeping the program alive and using strong guidelines for participating homeowners, Riverside County puts a serious question to Fannie and Freddie: are they willing to default or accelerate mortgages on thousands of homes, all with mortgage holders who are customers in good standing?

Photo credit

Tags: / / / / / / / /

About John Farrell

John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. More

Contact John   |   View all articles by John Farrell

  • Peter Lynch

    I am aware of quite a bit of data showing that PACE is not a problem at all. I have seen ZERO data that backs what FHFA “thinks” will happen – the facts support PACE.

    How this type of nonsense can go on and on is beyond me. Whatever the reason it is probably the same reason that solar systems in Germany can me installed for $2.40 per watt and with the same hard costs as Germany and lower labor rates it can be done in the U.S. at $6.50 per watt….

    Courage, common sense and integrity – PLEASE !!!!!!

  • James Wimberley

    Actually, it’s even worse than that: the German solar trade federation says that the average pre-tax installed price for<100kw rooftop PV systems (that is, residential and small commercial) is now €1.76 per watt, or $2.21. (Source: http://www.solarwirtschaft.de/fileadmin/media/pdf/BSW_facts_solarpower_en.pdf, page 4). It helps that Germany has no prior permitting for residential systems flat to the roof.