Back to top Jump to featured resources
Rule filed under The Public Good

Anti-Privatization Initiatives

| Written by ILSR Admin | No Comments | Updated on Nov 25, 2008 The content that follows was originally published on the Institute for Local Self-Reliance website at

Efforts to privatize government services in cities and states do not always save the city money, replace well paid and benefited largely unionized public workers with low paid, lesser benefited and non-unionized private workers, and reduce or even eliminate effective control over this public service by the public.  A number of states and cities have established rules governing the pace and process of privatization.



Pacheco Law in Massachusetts

In 1993, after Massachusetts government privatized 36 operations in the previous 3 years, the legislature passed what came to be called the Pacheco Law over then-Governor William F. Weld’s veto. The law imposes the strictest series of tests in the nation before a service can be privatized. Continue reading

Tags: / /

About ILSR Admin

Contact ILSR   |   View all articles by ILSR Admin