As debates ramp up about how Congress and watchdog agencies should address the monopoly power of Big Tech, ILSR legal fellow Shaoul Sussman argues in the American Prospect, with Hal Singer, that we must revoke the liability shield these platforms enjoy.
The liability shield was written into Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, at the dawn of the internet. The original purpose was to protect online service providers from liability when posting third-party content. In the era of dial-up, Sussman argues, regulators didn’t foresee the companies that now dominate the internet, and how this shield would give them a buffer that their counterpart brick-and-mortar retailers do not enjoy.
The resulting regulatory asymmetry, when combined with other forces such as the coronavirus, is perversely accelerating the demise of Main Street. If a mom-and-pop retailer sold an exploding hoverboard that killed its customers, it would face severe liability, and it should. There is no reason why Amazon should be treated differently.
For more about why Congress should remove this liability shield — and how — read Shaoul’s article here.
Unbuffered is here. In this kickoff episode, Chris Mitchell introduces a new chapter that builds on Community Broadband Bits while expanding the conversation around Internet...
Is the Internet Still a Public Good? – Episode 1 of Unbuffered
Unbuffered launches with a powerhouse roundtable on broadband policy, the FCC, media consolidation, and whether today’s tech ecosystem is helping or hurting the public.
Government Power, Media Empires, and the Fight for an Informed Public – Ep. 679 of Community Broadband Bits
Karl Bode joins Chris Mitchell for a wide-ranging conversation about media consolidation, government power, and what it all means for the future of journalism.