The City of Mount Shasta, California, caps stores at 50,000 square feet and requires proposals for stores over 20,000 square feet to undergo an economic impact review and obtain a conditional use permit.… Read More
In determining whether to approve or deny proposals for retail development, the Middletown Planning Board evaluates the project’s impact on traffic, municipal services, the environment, and the character of the community.… Read More
Los Angeles requires proposed supercenters to pass an economic impact review in order to gain approval. … Read More
Homer prohibits stores over 75,000 square feet and requires proposals for stores larger than 15,000 square feet to undergo a community impact review.… Read More
Greenfield, Massachusetts, requires proposed retail stores to undergo a special review if they are to exceed 20,000 square feet or generate more than 500 vehicle trips per day. … Read More
Among the most comprehensive of the municipal impact review laws, this proposed ordinance in Cranston, Rhode Island, would apply to all development projects involving retail stores of 75,000 square feet or more. It stipulates that these projects must undergo an independent economic impact analysis.… Read More
Carbondale’s plannign policy requires the town’s planning staff and city council to weigh the community and fiscal impacts of a large-scale retail proposal before deciding whether to approve or deny the project. The ordinance applies to any retail development larger than 15,000 square feet in neighborhood business districts and those larger than 30,000 square feet in other areas.… Read More
Brattleboro requires all proposals for retail stores in excess of 65,000 square feet to undergo an economic and community impact analysis. … Read More
Benicia, a town of 27,000 people located about 40 miles northeast of San Francisco, has adopted two ordinances, which stipulate that retail stores larger than 20,000 square feet and formula restaurants will not be approved unless they meet certain criteria.… Read More