Back to top Jump to featured resources
Featured Article filed under Energy, Energy Self-Reliant States

Setting the Value of Solar – Part 1 of Minnesota’s Process

| Written by John Farrell | 1 Comment | Updated on Sep 27, 2013 The content that follows was originally published on the Institute for Local Self-Reliance website at http://ilsr.org/setting-solar-part-1-minnesotas-process/
Winter solar panels Minnesota

What is solar worth to a utility? It’s an issue of national debate, but one unexpected state – Minnesota – is engaging a formal process for determining the methodology for setting the value of solar. As the first multi-utility process, it’s likely to set a precedent nationwide for what the “value of solar” will mean and whether it will aid the continued growth of distributed solar power.

So what’s happening with solar in Minnesota?

Starts with a Standard

It starts with the recently adopted solar energy standard, which requires investor-owned utilities to get 1.5% of their energy from solar by 2020, establishes a standard, long-term contract for buying distributed solar, and allows utilities to file for a “value of solar” tariff (VOST).

The Value of Solar Concept

The “value of solar” concept is designed to solve one of the most pressing problems with expanding solar power. Utilities see customers generating their own energy as a mortal threat to their business model, because the regulatory structure and their business rely on selling kilowatt-hours. The policy in place, net metering, allows customers to get a credit on their bill that’s the same whether they made power from the sun or reduced their energy use by turning off lights. Either way, it means less sales for the utility, but while the utility can’t fight conservation, they can make trouble for solar.

The value of solar concept is a means to catalog and make transparent the many benefits solar energy provides to the grid system (producing energy at times of high demand, being very close to where people use energy).  The idea is that utilities would pay solar producers that full value (on a per kilowatt-hour basis) and that customers would reduce their energy bill with the money from that sale, rather than a credit based on how much energy they produce.  The benefit to the utility would be transparent, and customers would continue to see how much energy they are using.

Minnesota’s Value of Solar Law

The law sets out the required components of the VOST:

  • Energy
  • Generation capacity
  • Transmission and distribution value
  • Transmission capacity
  • Environmental value

The law also empowers the responsible state agency (Division of Energy Resources at the Department of Commerce) and Public Utilities Commission to include the value of local manufacturing, systems installed at high value locations on the grid, and other factors.

Setting the value of solar is a two-part process:

  1. The Department of Commerce’s Division of Energy Resources (DER) develops the methodology/formulas for the utilities to use to calculate the value of solar, due in January 2014.
  2. The utility files their tariff, as calculated with DER’s methodology, for approval at the Public Utilities Commission

A Stakeholder Road to a Value of Solar Formula

Part 1 of the value of solar process (see link for agendas, presentations, etc) is underway, beginning with a Sept. 17 presentation of the concept, scope, and issues at stake. The meeting was largely focused on a presentation (below) by Lena Hansen and Virginia Lacy from the Rocky Mountain Institute.  Since it was basically everyone in Minnesota who is involved in solar policy or the solar business, there were a lot of white men present.

The presentation is an excellent and exhaustive compilation of the potential values of solar.  It highlights some of the biggest potential values (like hedging for 30 years or more against natural gas, with volatile prices and that can’t be purchased on a contract longer than 10 years).

Next Steps for MN’s Value of Solar

There were a few questions (the utilities liked throwing a few bombs about the “value of fossil fuels”), but the first meeting mostly set the stage for round 2 on October 1 (agenda and presentation) – a draft of DER’s value of solar methodology and presentations from stakeholders. I’ll be in attendance and live-tweeting (hashtag #MNVOST).

In the meantime, stakeholders submitted their comments on the value of solar methodology (scroll to bottom). You can read my VOST comments here.

 

Photo credit: CERTs

Tags: / / / / / / /

About John Farrell

John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. More

Contact John   |   View all articles by John Farrell

  • Doug

    For home owners if the utility paid for the production of roof top solar by check to the homeowner, would that than be taxable as opposed to reducing the electric bill with the production. this can make a significant difference. This is the way X Cel Energy handles it in Colorado. Not sure if it is taxable. Have not asked that question here.