Back to top Jump to featured resources
Article filed under Independent Business

New Jersey Considers Regional Impact Studies for Big-Box Stores

| Written by Stacy Mitchell | No Comments | Updated on Dec 8, 2004 The content that follows was originally published on the Institute for Local Self-Reliance website at https://ilsr.org/new-jersey-considers-regional-impact-studies-bigbox-stores/

Lawmakers in New Jersey have proposed legislation that would require communities to weigh the regional economic impact of proposed big-box stores before granting approval.

As drafted, the law would apply to stores over 130,000 square feet that sell at least 25,000 items with a minimum of ten percent of their revenue in nontaxable groceries. The measure would therefore cover Wal-Mart, Target, and Kmart supercenters, but would not affect big-box stores that do not sell groceries, such as Home Depot and Staples.

The legislation has two primary components. The first requires cities and towns to commission a regional economic impact study that would examine the effect of the store on retail employment, wages and benefits, existing businesses, commercial vacancies, the cost of public services, and the vehicle miles traveled by area residents for shopping.

Local governments “really should have as much information as possible going into the process,” said Senator Stephen Sweeney, one of the bill’s sponsors. City governments commonly approve big-box projects relying only on the job and tax figures supplied by the developer and with no information on potential costs.

The second component requires the municipality to notify neighboring towns of the proposed development. After reviewing the project, each adjoining community has the option of issuing a “resolution of intermunicipal concerns.” These concerns must then be addressed by a board composed of representatives of each of the surrounding towns.

The host city may approve the project only if it determines that the store would not cause “substantial detriment to the general welfare of the adjoining municipality based on the specific areas of intermunicipal concern raised” and that it would not impair the “intent and purpose of the master plan or zoning ordinance of the adjoining municipality.”

Neighboring communities may appeal the host town’s decision to a statewide Intermunicipal Impact Advisory Board.

Hearings on the bill began in November. Additional hearings are expected this month.

Tags: / /

About Stacy Mitchell

Stacy Mitchell is co-director of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, and directs its Community-Scaled Economy Initiative, which produces research and analysis, and partners with a range of allies to design and implement policies that curb economic consolidation and strengthen community-rooted enterprise.  She is the author of Big-Box Swindle and also produces a popular monthly newsletter, the Hometown Advantage Bulletin.  Connect with her on twitter and catch her TEDx Talk: Why We Can’t Shop Our Way to a Better Economy. More

Contact Stacy   |   View all articles by Stacy Mitchell