{"id":17658,"date":"2021-07-13T11:10:35","date_gmt":"2021-07-13T15:10:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/articles\/in-waste-dive-ilsr-argues-that-the-u-s-cant-directly-follow-the-european-model-of-epr\/"},"modified":"2024-05-01T18:30:31","modified_gmt":"2024-05-01T18:30:31","slug":"waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr","title":{"rendered":"In Waste Dive, ILSR Argues That the U.S. Can’t Directly Follow the European Model of EPR"},"template":"","class_list":["post-17658","article","type-article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","article_type-article","initiatives-composting-for-community","topics-extended-producer-responsibility","impact_areas-economic-justice","authors-neil-seldman"],"acf":{"details":{"featured_image":2090,"background_color":"","article_type":[134],"initiative":15,"display_event_fields":false,"start_date":null,"end_date":null,"start_time":null,"end_time":null,"time_zone":"America\/New_York","virtual_event":false,"location":"","topics":[75],"impact_areas":[20],"abstract":"

In a new opinion piece published in Waste Dive on July 8, ILSR’s Neil Seldman argues that Europe and the U.S. “live in different recycling and wasting landscapes” and that the European model may not be applicable to the US. … Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","authors_tax":[605]},"sidebar":{"title":"\u00cdndice"},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"

<\/div>

Opinion in Waste Dive: “EPR in the US Can’t Directly Follow the European Model; It Must Avoid a Producer Monopoly”<\/strong><\/p>\n

By Neil Seldman<\/p>\n

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation statement on extended producer responsibility (EPR)<\/a>, describing the system as \u201ca necessary part of the solution to packaging waste and pollution,\u201d expresses the keen desire to solve perhaps the most important aspect of contemporary municipal solid waste management.\u00a0These are complex problems with complex solutions.<\/p>\n

In Europe,\u00a0EPR\u00a0is an EU-wide mandate attempting to harmonize existing, longstanding national laws, institutions and culture. We should applaud these efforts from government and industry to resolve the issue of producer responsibility for the costs of recycling and wasting and build on the worthy experiment of the European Union.<\/p>\n

But, is the thinking and activity in Europe applicable to the U.S.? Does it inform us?<\/p>\n

Two different worlds<\/h3>\n

Europe and the U.S. live in different recycling and wasting landscapes. Lack of space requires that Europeans live in close proximity to incinerators. This is not the case in the spacious U.S. Locally organized citizens in the U.S. have defeated plans for more than 400 incinerators and are effectively forcing existing garbage incinerators to close. The U.S. anti-incineration movement faces new challenges with the introduction of plans to burn waste in cement kilns and burn plastics in gasification\/pyrolysis plants.<\/p>\n

In Europe, container deposits \u2014\u00a0or bottle bills \u2014\u00a0are the foundation of EPR. There are quotas for refillable containers and incentives for companies that switch to refillable containers. In the U.S., bottle bills have been the declared enemy of the beverage industry, the group which leads the lobbying for EPR, for 60 years \u2014\u00a0since Big Soda externalized the cost of refilling bottles on to the U.S. public. These companies frantically opposed new bottle bills and work to repeal existing ones with religious fervor. Consumer purchasing preferences have now forced U.S. packaging companies to pledge to have zero waste packaging (recyclable, compostable or reusable) by 2030, as touted in the recent TV ads by companies, such as the greenwashing Every Bottle Back campaign. Big Soda may soon change its policy, as “private bottle bills”\u00a0under the control of producers could capture hundreds of millions of dollars through unredeemed deposits, as in Oregon and Connecticut.<\/p>\n

In Europe, industry control through EPR reverses the theory of EPR. The \u201cpolluter pays\u201d principle becomes a producer control policy. In the U.S. it is seen as a hostile takeover of a vibrant and vital decentralized reduce, recycle, reuse and compost system.<\/p>\n

In Europe, the political culture and recycling and wasting policies come from the top down. In the U.S., the agitation for recycling and waste reduction comes from the grassroots, where citizens can impact local government through lobbying and elections. The bottom-up recycling system in the U.S. brought recycling from 5% in the 1960s to 35% by the early 2000s,\u00a0resulting in an industry with 56,000 companies and 750,000 workers with over $300 billion in wages.<\/p>\n

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation statement, based on the foundation’s Global Commitment 2020 Progress Report, maintains that EPR is the \u201conly proven\u201d pathway and \u201cnecessary\u201d to manage recycling. With cities and small towns in the U.S.\u00a0reaching rates of 50%, 60%, 70% and higher using methods available to any jurisdiction, the statement is counterintuitive.<\/p>\n

U.S. states, cities and counties have used waste surcharges and service fees to capitalize infrastructure. Newly proposed packaging taxes can focus on hybrid packages, especially hybrid plastic packaging, to further address elimination of this noxious material in our lives.\u00a0Industry investment in polypropylene and film plastic recycling is burgeoning. Investment in secondary paper manufacturing is soaring, as is investment in electronic scrap reuse. Yet another source of renewable capital for infrastructure is the Maine EPR bill, which focuses on reimbursement\u00a0of expenses for local governments to manage recycling and wasting and for expanding and deepening existing infrastructure needs. In addition, the Recycling Is Infrastructure Too campaign<\/a> initiated by Zero Waste USA, National Recycling Coalition and the ILSR calls for embedding recycling infrastructure investments in the jobs, infrastructure and environmental bills before Congress. State \u201cright to repair\u201d laws are drawing investment in small repair businesses and skills-training institutions in anticipation of thousands more jobs in this sector.<\/p>\n

Ample revenue for infrastructure investment is available through municipal reimbursement EPR, which is the settled policy position reached by the NRC, GAIA, Sierra Club, Zero Waste USA and the Save the Albatross Coalition after years of debate. Chaz Miller, veteran industry solid waste analyst,\u00a0says no to \u2018monopoly EPR\u2019<\/a>: \u201cA national EPR policy group will have unheard-of power over recycling … something none of us in the U.S. want.\u201d<\/p>\n

Both California and Washington State in 2021 rejected good recycling legislation fearing the EPR provisions that gave too much power to industry.<\/p>\n

Because the issues are so different in the U.S. than Europe, the statement from the MacArthur Foundation does not inform us. Much better help in thinking through the EPR issue are webinars such as the Product Stewardship Institute\u2019s June 17 webinar, featuring presentations from Maryland, Vermont and New York, which explained decision-making in each unique circumstance. With follow-up discussions, we understand the logic for a producer control bill in rural Vermont, as there are no counties and local government does not provide waste management services. Hence, the orientation is to have an industry-controlled system. In neighboring Maine, also a predominantly rural state, local government does provide services, so that bill, now law, calls for municipal reimbursement.<\/p>\n

These discussions are crucial. The country is alive with debate over how to proceed \u2014 whether to go with producer EPR, reimbursement EPR or no EPR and rely on traditional measures that overcome Big Soda and Big Waste barriers. The issues are far from settled. For example, the Maine law has options for producer control, still to be determined by the rule-making process. In Vermont\u2019s producer control bill, state officials are pondering fundamental questions: If Burlington, Vermont, which now uses single stream, decides to revert to dual stream, will the producer control system allow it?\u00a0The markets are drawing cities to this decision. In New Jersey, dual-stream processing is one-third less, or $30 to $40 less per ton, than single-stream processing. The New Jersey State Market Development Commission is examining single stream vs. dual stream and associated economics, which will inform local governments.<\/p>\n

Similarly, if a producer control bill in California passes, will cities and counties be able to sue industry for beach litter cleanup and to force packagers to \u2018tether the cap\u2019 to bottles to protect beachgoers\u00a0and keep plastic from lakes and seas?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Federal legislation<\/h3>\n

The healthy debate at the state and local level is threatened by the Break Free From Plastic Pollution (BFFPP) bill, which would cut off debate and impose a uniform system based on a federal structure of governance. It would preempt the vital and vibrant debate stimulating thinking through the country. Better to drop EPR\u00a0from the BFFPP\u00a0bill;\u00a0pass its critically needed clauses on plastic moratorium, ban on single-use plastic, national bottle bill, and emphasis on racial and environmental justice;\u00a0and let the debate now coursing through the U.S. body politic to continue for the next few years to allow states and their jurisdictions to create an encyclopedia of ideas and practices to consider as we solve the plastics and global warming crises.<\/p>\n

In fact, continued discussion on the nature of EPR\u00a0could help solve the plastic crisis. The BFFPP\u00a0bill has EPR\u00a0controlling all recycling, yet the focus of the bill is plastics. Plastics has a 9%\u00a0recycling rate<\/a>\u00a0and requires different approaches than paper recycling, whose rate is already over 60%.<\/p>\n

Congress should strip EPR\u00a0from the BFFPP\u00a0bill and pass the remaining important features. Wait to see what the next few years bring with state-level EPR\u00a0efforts. Congress should immediately focus on infrastructure support. Federal action could also boost the value of secondary materials in the economy through a carbon tax, which increases the value of secondary materials with embedded labor and energy and extraction costs. Additionally, the U.S. government should provide matching grants to states that implement surcharges on waste disposed of in landfills and incinerators with dedicated funds for recycling infrastructure investments.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Supporters of producer control EPR\u00a0\u201cHave failed to consider the consequences of their program,\u201d longtime activist Alan Muller of Green Delaware said in a correspondence years ago.<\/p>\n

In the U.S., recycling is storming back from the debacle of the loss of the China market in 2018 caused by decades of single-stream recycling. Private and public investment is flowing, new rules are being passed at the local level, and we are at the cusp of federal support needed since the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act became law in 1976.<\/p>\n

Federal producer control EPR\u00a0legislation will cut off bottom-up progress and put the control in the hands of the packaging industry \u2014\u00a0an industry which has been content with mediocre recycling for two decades and whose current investment plans will extend sloppy recycling methods at great cost of high-tech separation equipment. The U.S. can do much better by reverting back to its origins in citizen agitation and local control.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Credit: Photo by Nick Fewings<\/a> sobre Unsplash<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

<\/div>\"Facebook\"<\/a>\"twitter\"<\/a>\"reddit\"<\/a>\"mail\"<\/a>","":null,"settings":[]}}]},"yoast_head":"\nIn Waste Dive, ILSR Argues That the U.S. Can't Directly Follow the European Model of EPR | Composting for Community<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Composting for Community article by Neil Seldman explores Extended Producer Responsibility, focusing on Economic Justice\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_MX\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In Waste Dive, ILSR Argues That the U.S. Can't Directly Follow the European Model of EPR | Composting for Community\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Composting for Community article by Neil Seldman explores Extended Producer Responsibility, focusing on Economic Justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Institute for Local Self-Reliance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/localselfreliance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-01T18:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/nick-fewings-2lJGRIY5P0-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1706\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/\",\"name\":\"In Waste Dive, ILSR Argues That the U.S. Can't Directly Follow the European Model of EPR | Composting for Community\",\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/nick-fewings-2lJGRIY5P0-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-13T15:10:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-01T18:30:31+00:00\",\"description\":\"Composting for Community article by Neil Seldman explores Extended Producer Responsibility, focusing on Economic Justice\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/nick-fewings-2lJGRIY5P0-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/nick-fewings-2lJGRIY5P0-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1706},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Articles\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/articles\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In Waste Dive, ILSR Argues That the U.S. Can’t Directly Follow the European Model of EPR\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/\",\"name\":\"Institute for Local Self-Reliance\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Institute for Local Self-Reliance\",\"alternateName\":\"ILSR\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ilsr_color.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ilsr_color.png\",\"width\":509,\"height\":290,\"caption\":\"Institute for Local Self-Reliance\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/localselfreliance\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/institute-for-local-self-reliance\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ilsr_org\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In Waste Dive, ILSR Argues That the U.S. Can't Directly Follow the European Model of EPR | Composting for Community","description":"Composting for Community article by Neil Seldman explores Extended Producer Responsibility, focusing on Economic Justice","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/","og_locale":"es_MX","og_type":"article","og_title":"In Waste Dive, ILSR Argues That the U.S. Can't Directly Follow the European Model of EPR | Composting for Community","og_description":"Composting for Community article by Neil Seldman explores Extended Producer Responsibility, focusing on Economic Justice","og_url":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/","og_site_name":"Institute for Local Self-Reliance","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/localselfreliance","article_modified_time":"2024-05-01T18:30:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1706,"url":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/nick-fewings-2lJGRIY5P0-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/","url":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/","name":"In Waste Dive, ILSR Argues That the U.S. Can't Directly Follow the European Model of EPR | Composting for Community","primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/nick-fewings-2lJGRIY5P0-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg","datePublished":"2021-07-13T15:10:35+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-01T18:30:31+00:00","description":"Composting for Community article by Neil Seldman explores Extended Producer Responsibility, focusing on Economic Justice","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/nick-fewings-2lJGRIY5P0-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/nick-fewings-2lJGRIY5P0-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg","width":2560,"height":1706},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/article\/composting-for-community\/waste-dive-ilsr-argues-directly-follow-european-model-epr\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Articles","item":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In Waste Dive, ILSR Argues That the U.S. Can’t Directly Follow the European Model of EPR"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/","name":"Instituto para la Autosuficiencia Local","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/#organization","name":"Instituto para la Autosuficiencia Local","alternateName":"ILSR","url":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ilsr_color.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ilsr_color.png","width":509,"height":290,"caption":"Institute for Local Self-Reliance"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/localselfreliance","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/institute-for-local-self-reliance\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ilsr_org\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/17658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/17658\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2090"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}