{"id":15779,"date":"2016-06-13T09:34:47","date_gmt":"2016-06-13T13:34:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/articles\/the-future-of-garbage-in-maryland-is-not-what-it-used-to-be\/"},"modified":"2024-05-01T17:59:38","modified_gmt":"2024-05-01T17:59:38","slug":"the-future-of-garbage-in-maryland-is-not-what-it-used-to-be","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/ilsr.org\/es\/article\/composting-for-community\/the-future-of-garbage-in-maryland-is-not-what-it-used-to-be","title":{"rendered":"The Future of Garbage in Maryland Is Not What It Used To Be"},"template":"","migration":[],"article_type":[134],"initiatives":[15],"topics":[87,121],"impact_areas":[],"authors":[605],"class_list":["post-15779","article","type-article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","article_type-article","initiatives-composting-for-community","topics-incineration","topics-zero-waste","authors-neil-seldman"],"acf":{"details":{"featured_image":6629,"background_color":"","article_type":[134],"initiative":15,"display_event_fields":false,"display_case_study_fields":false,"start_date":null,"end_date":null,"start_time":null,"end_time":null,"time_zone":"America\/New_York","virtual_event":false,"location":"","locality":"","state":"","topics":[87,121],"impact_areas":false,"abstract":"

A few years ago it looked like Maryland would start to resemble states like Connecticut and Massachusetts that invested heavily in garbage incineration. Baltimore has a downtown incinerator, Harford County wanted to expand theirs, Washington County wanted its own facility, Frederick and Carroll Counties were under contract for building\u00a0a new 1,500 ton per day plant, a … Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","authors_tax":[605]},"sidebar":{"title":"\u00cdndice"},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"

<\/div>

A few years ago it looked like Maryland would start to resemble states like Connecticut and Massachusetts that invested heavily in garbage incineration. Baltimore has a downtown incinerator, Harford County wanted to expand theirs, Washington County wanted its own facility, Frederick and Carroll Counties were under contract for building\u00a0a new 1,500 ton per day plant, a private company wanted to build a 4,000 ton per day plant at\u00a0Curtis Bay in south Baltimore, and Prince George\u2019s County began exploring \u2018conversion technologies\u2019 or as Bradley Angel of GreenAction for Environment and Health calls them, \u2018incinerators in disguise.\u2019<\/p>\n

Yet today the landscape has changed. Remarkable citizen and small business organizing efforts have defeated the proposals for incinerators in Curtis Bay and in Frederick County. These efforts demonstrate that organized communities can\u00a0defeat entrenched politicians, industrial companies, and Wall Street banks. Keys to success were\u00a0the\u00a0objective analysis of contractual and financial risks, technical details of the health impacts of incineration for residents, the use of social media to by-pass media black outs, formal testimony at public hearings and many, many meetings in homes and community forums. \u00a0The economics of burning garbage not only stopped the expansion plans for Harford County,\u00a0but also caused that facility to cease operations in March 2016. \u00a0Washington County has also abandoned its plans for a garbage incinerator.<\/p>\n

Prince George\u2019s County presses on with Residual Plastic Fuel (RFP)\u00a0and\u00a0Refuse Derived Fuel\u00a0(RDF) which is\u00a0prepared fuel from processed garbage comprised of plastic, paper and dried organics to be used\u00a0for conversion technologies, including gasification.\u00a0\u00a0The defeat of the south Baltimore facility in Curtis Bay closed off an option for Prince George\u2019s County to produce and then send RDF\u00a0to Baltimore\u00a0for incineration. Other options remain as RDF can be shipped\u00a0to existing cement kilns or industrial boilers to be used as fuel. These facilities are smaller than garbage incineration plants, and therefore slide under the EPA regulations for burning garbage, yielding higher levels of air pollution into the surrounding communities.<\/p>\n

The existing BRESCO garbage incinerator sitting in downtown Baltimore burns 2,250 tons of garbage each day. It is an aging plant and is among the major polluting facilities in the city threatening public health and the environment. The city benefits from a very low net tip fee of about $50 per ton, possibly the lowest tip fee for any major city in the US. \u00a0Ash from the facility is disposed at the city\u2019s Quarantine Road Landfill in Hawkins Point on the Fairfield Peninsula. The city\u2019s contract with the plant runs out in 2021. If the city continues to use the old facility it will have to expand the landfill into the community. The Energy Justice Network and Physicians for Social responsibility, among other groups, are working with citizens in the Westport community adjacent to the plant who want BRESCO phased out through economically and environmentally better ways to handle the city\u2019s trash.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n

BRESCO BACKGROUND
\n<\/strong><\/h4>\n

While the location of the incinerator in the Westport community, in the heart of downtown Baltimore, is convenient for haulers, it is dangerous to residents. Since opening in 1985 the facility has burned 2,250 tons of garbage each day and is the major source of pollution in the City. it has a rated capacity of 60 MW per day. Dante Swinton, of the Energy Justice Network, has compiled and summarized the impact of the emissions from the plant. The BRESCO Plant, according to the Toxic Release Inventory, is the number one source of emissions of Mercury (89%), Hydrochloric Acid (88%), Sulfur Dioxide (80%), Nitrous Oxide (NOx) (55%), Formaldehyde and Carbon Monoxide; number 3 in PM2, 5 and fourth in Chromium. The plant also emits Dioxin; the most toxic man made chemical which leads to significant increases in lifetime cancer rates. According to the US EPA in 2015, Interim Status Report, asthma is the leading cause of absenteeism among Baltimore students. PM2.5, Sulfur Dioxide and NOx are major contributors to asthma and other respiratory ailments.<\/p>\n

Even an optimally functioning incinerator, with adequate oversight, generates a high level of pollution. But Mike Ewall of the Energy Justice Network points out that monitoring of the emissions from the Wheelabrator Baltimore plant is sorely inadequate. \u201cThe incinerators in Maryland are tested once per year by the state Department of Energy and Environment.\u201d<\/p>\n

Dr. Gwen Dubois, Physicians for Social Responsibility indicates what these levels of pollution can mean to Baltimore\u2019s residents: Mercury and lead contribute to neurologic damage and loss of IQ; Fine particulate matter causes heart attacks, lung cancer and increases mortality; volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides forms ozone pollution and causes asthma, respiratory illness and death from respiratory diseases. The incinerator also emits hundreds of thousands of tons of carbon dioxide and other planet warming gases. \u201cSouth Baltimore residents have shown by getting the MD Department of Energy and Environment to pull the permit for a 4,000 ton per day garbage incinerator, that activism and coalition work is the path to greater environmental justice.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

In addition to opposing the BRESCO plant, citizens and environmentalists\u00a0want to close the Montgomery County trash incinerator that has a contract that expires in 2021, and are fighting pro-incineration efforts\u00a0supported by policies put into place\u00a0by Maryland’s previous governor,\u00a0Martin O’Malley.\u00a0O’Malley signed an Executive Order stopping the siting of any new landfills in Maryland which effectively would require all garbage to be incinerated.<\/p>\n

This year’s opposition stopped a bill that would have allowed the Northeast Maryland Solid Waste Disposal Authority (NMWDA), a state agency created in 1980 to promote and site trash incinerators, to expand its role in project decision-making, and to continue\u00a0its efforts to build more combustion facilities in the state. The proposed legislation would have directly benefited the NMWDA\u00a0since it is funded from bonding and operating\u00a0any facility it builds and manages on behalf of its members, including garbage incinerators.\u00a0\u00a0And although the\u00a0bill did not pass this year, citizens and environmentalists expect renewed effort for anti-recycling\/pro-burning bills during next year’s legislative session in Annapolis.<\/p>\n

Citizens are also opposed to the state\u2019s recently developed so-called Zero Waste Plan, which is not a Zero Waste plan, but instead calls for incineration and is what is known as a \u2018Zero Waste to Landfill\u2019 program. But there is no such thing – all incinerators need landfills for the large amounts of ash\u00a0created from incineration, waste that cannot not fit in the incinerator and for by-pass waste when the incinerator is down for maintenance or repairs; totaling up to 30% of the input to the incinerator. A true Zero Waste Plan would have no incineration and would landfill less waste than an incinerator.<\/p>\n

Finally, Maryland citizens and environmentalists are opposed to the state\u2019s classification of garbage incineration as eligible for Tier 1 tax credits under the federal Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), thus subsidizing garbage incineration for energy. Maryland is the only state in the country that allows this credit for incineration, which is typically reserved for wind and solar energy facilities.<\/p>\n

The battle lines have been drawn for several years. Yet the momentum of the anti-incineration forces has been steady and growing and has proven effective in campaigns that last for years.<\/p>\n

In 2014 organized citizens and small business owners in Carroll and Frederick Counties, Maryland completed a nearly 10-year long battle to stop the implementation of a 1,500-ton per day mass burn garbage incinerator facility in their community. The effort brought out the best in local activism: careful analysis of the contract and its financial implications, sophisticated use of media, many small meetings with civic groups, public demonstrations, confronting elected officials and the NMWDA\u00a0on conflict of interest concerns,\u00a0as well as failure to understand the contracts before them. \u00a0And, above all, the citizens persevered in their pursuit of sound recycling and economic alternatives.<\/p>\n

After extensive public hearings where the overwhelming number of participants expressed opposition, the plan for the incinerator continued to move forward. Carroll County citizens continued to object, and on their own they formed a working group to focus on the contracts, costs and politics of the plant. They called expert witnesses and explored the state of the art composting, recycling, incineration, transfer stations and landfills. Within 6 months they produced a detailed report that outlined a Zero Waste approach to replace the need for the proposed incinerator. County Commissioners could not ignore the report. The deal was so bad for taxpayers that within six months of the report being issued the Commissioners reversed their decision and decided to quit the partnership with Frederick County. Carroll County set aside $3 million to cover the cost of possible penalties for backing out of the contract. Carroll County eventually had to pay $1 million to exit the incinerator contract.<\/p>\n

Frederick citizens and small business people had a tougher row to hoe. After all, the incinerator was the brainchild of Frederick County Commissioners and solid waste management staff. So Frederick County officials, Wheelabrator, Inc., the NMWDA and consultants hung tough. They were being well paid for their efforts with promises of bigger paydays in the future.<\/p>\n

Public discussion of the careful dissection of the contract by citizens revealed that billions of public dollars were at stake; a fact could not be swept under the rug.\u00a0 It turns out that citizens were the only ones to actually read and comprehend the substantial and alarming legal and related financial risks of the long-term contract. The county would be committed to the highest possible environmental and financial costs and risks when simpler alternatives were apparent throughout numerous cities and counties across the U.S. \u00a0No County official knew the content of what they had signed, and the information publicized by citizens was stunning; the contract heavily favored the\u00a0NMWDA and Wheelabrator, Inc. while the county faced liabilities to be backed by the local taxpayers. \u00a0However, due to the lack of understanding of the contract by the Frederick County officials and even the NMWDA, there was a chance that Frederick County or Carroll County could avoid the fees for withdrawing from the agreement. \u00a0The citizens capitalized on the opportunity when Wheelabrator and the NMWDA failed to meet a four-year deadline in getting the project started.<\/p>\n

El\u00a0Goldman Prize for Environmental Leadership<\/a>\u00a0that was recently awarded\u00a0to one of\u00a0the Curtis\u00a0Bay anti-incineration fighters has given publicity and enthusiasm for opponents. The economics of burning garbage, the promise of more jobs from recycling and reuse companies locating in the city,\u00a0and the emerging community\u00a0support for composting and\u00a0food production in\u00a0low-income\u00a0communities (garden and farm\u00a0programs) are all drivers\u00a0working\u00a0against incineration for Baltimore, and\u00a0within the entire\u00a0state.<\/p>\n

The rest of the U.S. will benefit from this outcome as several citizens who became involved in the local battles through Zero Waste Carroll County and No Incineration Frederick County are now national experts and are helping other communities face similar challenges.<\/p>\n

For the details of the Frederick\/Carroll County defeated incinerator\u00a0see these links:<\/p>\n