Back to top Jump to featured resources
filed under Energy

Report: Energy Self-Reliant States – Second and Expanded Edition

| Written by John Farrell | 14 Comments | Updated on Oct 6, 2009 The content that follows was originally published on the Institute for Local Self-Reliance website at https://ilsr.org/energy-selfreliant-states-second-and-expanded-edition/
state self reliance all.jpg

Available NowEnergy Self-Reliant States 2ed (also new wind estimates May 2010)

How self-sufficient in energy generation could states be if they relied only on their own renewable resources? In November 2008, ILSR began to address this question in the first edition of Energy Self-Reliant States.  That report included a limited set of resources – on-shore wind and rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) – and also examined the potential for biomass-derived transportation fuels.

This updated edition of Energy Self-Reliant States narrows the focus to electricity, but includes virtually all renewable resources (on shore and off shore wind, micro hydro, combined heat and power, geothermal, rooftop PV).  We also discuss the potential gains from improving energy efficiency and estimate the per kWh costs for each state to become energy independent.

The data in this report suggest that every state could generate a significant percentage of its electricity with homegrown renewable energy. At least three-fifths of the fifty states could meet all their internal electricity needs from renewable energy generated inside their borders.  Every state with a renewable energy mandate can meet it with in-state renewable fuels. And, as the report discusses, even these estimates may be conservative.

state clean energy potential ESRS ILSR

Renewable energy is found everywhere and in most cases can be economically harnessed everywhere.  Federal policy should encourage all states, communities, individual households and businesses to maximize their internal use of this ubiquitous resource.  Such a policy would reinforce the clear desire for states and cities to combine a low carbon energy strategy with an aggressive energy-based economic development strategy.

Regrettably, current federal energy policy largely focuses on harnessing the renewable energy in a handful of states, constructing a $100-200 billion extra high voltage national transmission network and transporting that energy a thousand or more miles to customers in other regions.

The rationale for this focus on new extra high voltage transmission lines is that while renewable energy is widely distributed, the availability of these resources and the cost of harnessing them vary widely.

That is true.  Nevada has significantly more annual solar energy than Oregon.  North Dakota has higher speed and more reliable wind than Indiana.  This means that Nevada can generate solar electricity cheaper than Oregon and North Dakota can generate wind electricity cheaper than Indiana.

However, when transmission costs are taken into account, the net cost variations among states are quite modest.   And when we factor in the overall social, environmental and economic benefits to the 50 states from homegrown energy generation, self-reliance is almost always cheaper than import-dependence.

New: see co-author John Farrell interviewed about this report on Etopia News.

Newer (May 3, 2010):  Energy Self-Reliant States has been updated with data from new wind estimates released by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.  See a discussion of the changes and/or download the revised report.

Download the PDF

About John Farrell

John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. More

Contact John   |   View all articles by John Farrell

  • http://www.protekconstruction.com/ Ben

    I agree with you John 100% about the downsides to transmission. The state does need to focus on their own renewable energy sources. How do you think the bloombox will affect the power companies? I think it would be a great solution to power my large metal building warehouse without the use of wind.

  • http://solargardens.org Alvin Mites

    Thank you for the analysis, I agree with the premise that the economies of big centralized solar are as-cue when considering the loss inherent in long distance transmission. Also agree whole heartedly about the intrinsic value in structuring local self reliance.

  • greenwar

    To Nicholas Arguimbau: Just based on your comment here, I’m guessing you don’t understand the concept of national sovereignty too well.

  • Pingback: Monday, September 29: Next Steps in Solving the Climate Crisis » Clearing the FOG Radio()