California County’s PACE Program Could Get Feisty with FHFA

Date: 23 Aug 2012 | posted in: Energy, Energy Self Reliant States | 2 Facebooktwitterredditmail

Does a Riverside County, CA, residential energy financing program put thousands of homeowners on a collision course with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA)?

In a proposed rule-making, the FHFA has suggested that Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) policies represent a threat to the safety and soundness of mortgages held by government-backed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  PACE is a unique financing strategy that allows homes and businesses to invest in significant energy efficiency and renewable energy upgrades and pay them back through a property tax assessment (for an explanation of PACE, see this PACE 101 slideshow).  The fight with FHFA stems from these assessments being “first liens,” e.g. in the event of bankruptcy, they are paid back before the mortgage holder (FHFA’s Fannie or Freddie).

The FHFA’s initial ruling in 2010 brought most residential PACE programs to a screeching halt, because residential participants would be threatened with having to pay their entire mortgage – in full – at any time.  Residential PACE programs in Boulder, CO, and Sonoma County, CA, and elsewhere were suspended after the FHFA ruling.

But Riverside County launched its Home Energy Renovation Opportunity (HERO) Financing Program in late 2011, almost a year after FHFA had thrown down the gauntlet.  Since then, over 2,000 homeowners have signed up (acknowledging the FHFA threat in writing) and proceeded with tens of millions in home renovations improving efficiency, generating local energy, and creating jobs.  These participants have already met thresholds for positive equity in their home, and been current on the mortgage and property tax payments.

By keeping the program alive and using strong guidelines for participating homeowners, Riverside County puts a serious question to Fannie and Freddie: are they willing to default or accelerate mortgages on thousands of homes, all with mortgage holders who are customers in good standing?

Photo credit

John Farrell
Follow John Farrell:
John Farrell

John Farrell directs the Energy Democracy initiative at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance and he develops tools that allow communities to take charge of their energy future, and pursue the maximum economic benefits of the transition to 100% renewable power.

2 Responses

  1. Peter Lynch
    | Reply

    I am aware of quite a bit of data showing that PACE is not a problem at all. I have seen ZERO data that backs what FHFA “thinks” will happen – the facts support PACE.

    How this type of nonsense can go on and on is beyond me. Whatever the reason it is probably the same reason that solar systems in Germany can me installed for $2.40 per watt and with the same hard costs as Germany and lower labor rates it can be done in the U.S. at $6.50 per watt….

    Courage, common sense and integrity – PLEASE !!!!!!

  2. James Wimberley
    | Reply

    Actually, it’s even worse than that: the German solar trade federation says that the average pre-tax installed price for<100kw rooftop PV systems (that is, residential and small commercial) is now €1.76 per watt, or $2.21. (Source:, page 4). It helps that Germany has no prior permitting for residential systems flat to the roof.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *