Walmart, Amazon, and other powerful, well-financed companies have captured control over much of retailing. These giants maintain their extraordinary market position not by competing on the merits of their service. Instead, they exert their power as dominant buyers of food and goods to bully suppliers, extracting discounts for themselves while forcing independent retailers to pay more. This is threatening those small businesses, wounding competition, and hollowing out communities large and small. It’s a monopoly tactic we call “predatory buying.”
In this report, we examine the history of these abuses, the law Congress passed in 1936 to protect independent businesses’ right to compete on fair terms, and the pro-bigness coup that stopped enforcement of the law in the 1970s. Next, we explore how the refusal to stop predatory buying has allowed big businesses to shut out their smaller rivals and the harm this has inflicted on communities and the economy. Finally, we show how regulators and Congress can step in to kickstart enforcement of the law and strengthen it to protect the liberty of independent businesses and the diverse communities they serve.
Read the report here.
If you like this post, be sure to sign up for the monthly Hometown Advantage newsletter for our latest reporting and research.
"Much of Walmart’s market dominance can be attributed to its use of this illegal and anti-competitive tactic," says Stacy Mitchell
The decision to stop enforcing a single law decimated the independent grocery market and led to the dominance of big chains.
The FTC's lawsuit against Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits, utilizing the Robinson-Patman Act, could be an opportunity to restore fairness to the American economy
How a federal policy change in the 1980s created the modern food desert.