Back to top Jump to featured resources
Article filed under Energy, Energy Self-Reliant States

Net Metering a Cost to Utilities, or a Benefit?

| Written by John Farrell | 1 Comment | Updated on Apr 11, 2012 The content that follows was originally published on the Institute for Local Self-Reliance website at http://ilsr.org/net-metering-cost-utilities-benefit-2/
5347619425_1ae1a58b89_z

Update: A third-party study of net metering in California also found that solar customers provide more benefit than cost to the utility

Utilities often claim that allowing customers to run their meter backward (by generating electricity on-site, e.g. from rooftop solar) can affect their bottom line because these customers don’t pay enough to cover the cost of maintaining the grid.  In at least one case, however, a utility’s cost-benefit analysis of net metering was turned on its head in an independent review.

Presenting as part of Vote Solar’s Data Not Drama webinar on net metering last month, Interstate Renewable Energy Council’s (IREC) Joe Wiedman showed the Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) erred in proposed standby charge of 5.3 cents per kWh for net metering customers.  The utility asserted that this charge – ostensibly to backup these on-site generators – would allow the utility to recover its costs from these customers busily spinning back their meters.  IREC’s review of their analysis, however, showed that net metering was actually a net benefit to the utility.

The differences were substantial. While PNM had given almost no value to net metering systems, IREC’s review found that the on-site generation helped the utility avoid energy costs, line losses, capacity upgrades, and transmission costs worth over 15 cents per kWh.  Even when balance against the transmission and distribution costs, and power generation costs to the utility of supporting net metering, the policy had a net benefit of 7.8 cents per kWh, a 13-cent difference!

The following chart illustrates, with the perceived costs shown in red (positive) and perceived benefits in green (negative).

The lesson for advocates of distributed generation is clear: challenge utility valuation of net metering and of distributed renewable energy.  You can never be sure what they overlook.

 

Tags: / / / / / / / / / / / / /

About John Farrell

John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. More

Contact John   |   View all articles by John Farrell

  • Paul

    Solar harvesters should be paid twice the market rate for each kWh they feed on to the grid. YouTube paul8 Kangas

    Germany is successful because they pay 2X the market rate.